What’s the Nurse Licensure Compact?
The Nurse Licensure Compact was established in 1999 to remove barriers related to practicing in multiple states for RNs and LPNs. Previously, nurses had to be licensed “state-by-state, creating barriers to geographic mobility and interstate work,” according to a February 2023 Brookings commentary.
“In the late 1990s, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) explored a ‘mutual recognition model’ between participating states for licensing of registered nurses (RNs) and practical/vocational nurses (LPN/VNs),’ the commentary stated.
In addition to allowing nurses to practice across state lines, both in person and via telehealth, the compact:
- Facilitates online nursing education;
- Removes “burdensome expenses” on employers;
- Facilitates speedy disaster response across state lines;
- And “makes practicing across state borders affordable and convenient,” according to the NLC.
Nurses must maintain legal residency in the state where their compact license was issued and remain in good standing, though there’s no expiration on a compact, or multi-state, license.
Opposition to the Nurse Licensure Compact
Kimberly Sandor, executive director of the Connecticut Nurses Association, wrote to the state’s public health committee in March opposing the measure. She specifically noted a loss of confidentiality for nurses using the Health Assistance InterVention Education Network (HAVEN) and a loss of funds for HAVEN, the state’s confidential program for nurses that offers support for those who have a chemical dependency, emotional/behavioral disorder, or physical/mental illness.
“This is a major step backwards for nurses in CT, to lose the privilege of confidentiality, and potentially threaten the finances of HAVEN,” Sandor wrote. “CT’s HAVEN program stands out across the country, and this would move mental health and the CT approach backwards.”
HAVEN’s funding, according to CNA, comes from professional licensure fees, rather than the state of Connecticut.
CNA conducted an informal member survey this year, in which 75% of respondents were in favor of the idea of a compact. However, Sandor wrote that when they were “educated about the potential harmful impact on a nurse receiving confidential services from HAVEN, and loss of funding to HAVEN,” many changed their position.
A May Connecticut Insider report noted that some of CNA’s concerns (HAVEN funding and a license cancellation process, for example) have been addressed through amendments.
But the organization’s initial concerns about joining the NLC are not unique. Others have voiced opposition due to “falling nursing board revenues and work standards, a lack of disciplinary oversight, and a loss of sovereignty to the [Interstate Commission of Nurse Licensure Compact Administrators] ICNLCA,” according to the Brookings commentary. Advocacy groups also had concerns about less bargaining power and “wage depression” under the compact.
“If, for example, the removal of licensing restrictions encourages nurses to travel to a state that enjoys elevated wages, then unionized nurses may suffer from declining wages, erasing the above-average wages that the state boasted before joining the compact,” the Brookings commentary authors stated.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc0d0/cc0d0863bb24394b2a20deda33e87e92e88e4561" alt="Nurse Licensure Compact"